Derniers sujets
» Bonne fête Pat Essa
Aujourd'hui à 20:02 par Sébastien Desforges

» Semaine du 21 mai 2017
Aujourd'hui à 16:59 par Alain Roy

» It is happening again...
Aujourd'hui à 10:39 par Jonathan Ménard

» Votre plus ancien achat toujours en cave
Aujourd'hui à 8:37 par FrancisRémillard

» Foillard Côte de Py 2014
Hier à 19:53 par Patrick Ayotte

» Semaine du 14 mai 2017
Hier à 19:51 par Patrick Ayotte

» Bouchon DIAM
Dim 21 Mai 2017 - 11:34 par Michel Therrien

» Club des vins d'Abitibi-Ouest
Ven 19 Mai 2017 - 16:08 par Mario Vaillancourt

» Arrivage Signature - 18 mai 2017
Ven 19 Mai 2017 - 16:00 par Mario Vaillancourt

» Courrier Vinicole - Bourgogne 2014
Mer 17 Mai 2017 - 7:07 par Yves Martineau

» Arrivage du 18 mai à la Signature Mtl
Mar 16 Mai 2017 - 21:12 par Patrick Ayotte

» Semaine du 7 mai 2017
Mar 16 Mai 2017 - 20:34 par Patrick Ayotte

» Beaujolais "Deluxe"
Mar 16 Mai 2017 - 4:05 par Michel Therrien

» Bonne fête des mères
Dim 14 Mai 2017 - 16:27 par Michel Therrien

» Signature ou Entrepôt
Sam 13 Mai 2017 - 9:32 par Yves Martineau

Mai 2017
LunMarMerJeuVenSamDim
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Calendrier Calendrier


True Taste : The Seven Essential Wine Words de Matt Kramer

Voir le sujet précédent Voir le sujet suivant Aller en bas

True Taste : The Seven Essential Wine Words de Matt Kramer

Message par Vincent Messier-Lemoyne le Lun 4 Jan 2016 - 16:38

L’avez-vous lu? J’ai souvent aimé Kramer dans ses articles du Wine Spectator, à l’époque où je le lisais. Je n’ai pas lu son dernier livre, mais ce qu’en dit Meadows me donne envie :

These chosen seven, which also serve as the chapter titles, are Insight, Harmony, Texture, Layers, Finesse, Surprise and Nuance.

Perhaps the most interesting, and ultimately the most useful, observation that Kramer makes is deriding the “…universal use of flavor descriptors…” as a tacit substitute for insight. In doing so he strongly rejects the argument that tasting acuity trumps the ability to connect the dots about a wine’s intrinsic quality and just as importantly, its typicity. In other words, can the taster, when writing about or discussing a wine, put aside fruit and flavor descriptors and instead provide meaningful and pertinent context? As someone who obviously writes about wine all the time, I can confirm Kramer’s main thesis that it is much easier to describe a wine than it is to arrive at incisive judgments about it. This is because anyone that is paying attention can describe the attributes of a wine but it is much more difficult to put that same wine into its proper context: is the wine consistent with the producer style; does it accurately reflect its terroir; and finally does it deliver the same, better or worse quality than one would reasonably expect given vintage quality.

Just as importantly, he encourages the reader to move beyond the populist mantra that the only aspect of a wine that really counts is whether he or she likes it or not noting that personal preference is, well, just that. He argues that this indiscriminate fixation with “I like it or I don’t like it” is not the fundamental criterion of assessing wine quality but is rather no more than a simple reflection of personal preference. Indeed he firmly suggests that real connoisseurship is the ability to set aside our stylistic preferences and assess wine quality even in one for which we don’t care for the style.

Pas un point de vue populaire, mais assurément courageux!

_________________
"Mes goûts sont simples, je me contente aisément de ce qu'il y a de meilleur" - Winston Churchill
avatar
Vincent Messier-Lemoyne

Messages : 7318
Date d'inscription : 12/05/2009
Age : 32
Localisation : Montréal

Voir le profil de l'utilisateur

Revenir en haut Aller en bas

Voir le sujet précédent Voir le sujet suivant Revenir en haut

- Sujets similaires

 
Permission de ce forum:
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum